Let's get some chatter going. Who agrees?
https://carbuzz.com/features/ranking-ev ... st-to-best
Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk
www.ColoradoClassicBroncos.com
A place for Coloradans to unite with our love of 66-77 Ford Broncos
Ranking the generations
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Ranking the generations
by phyler » Mon Feb 05, 2024 6:49 pm
1975 Ranger Edition that I've had longer than I've been without it.
- phyler
- CCB Admin
- Posts: 1202
- Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:41 pm
- Location: Erie
Re: Ranking the generations
by Eck » Mon Feb 05, 2024 7:58 pm
I think I agree with that list.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
-
Eck - Official CCB Member
- Posts: 2460
- Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:33 pm
Re: Ranking the generations
by phyler » Tue Feb 06, 2024 5:08 pm
I always struggle to tell the 3rd through 5th generations. I never really liked them so I agree over all. The second Gen has grown on me a lot though over the past few years.
Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk
Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk
1975 Ranger Edition that I've had longer than I've been without it.
- phyler
- CCB Admin
- Posts: 1202
- Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:41 pm
- Location: Erie
Re: Ranking the generations
by ZOSO » Tue Feb 06, 2024 6:34 pm
1,2,3,6,5,4. I grew up in the 1,2,3 broncos so they are some of my favorites. Its a tie between 6, and 5. Dont care for the 4th.
Rob
74 Ranger EFI351w, 4r70w, ARB 5.13 9in, ARB 5.13D44, and a bunch of other goodies. Best of all the family memories.
04 Mustang Cobra, KenneBell 2.2 feeding a lot of boost on E85. Tire shredding machine
New project: 77 Bronco Ranger, body work and more body work.
Very little left of a 72 durango tan explorer sport
74 Ranger EFI351w, 4r70w, ARB 5.13 9in, ARB 5.13D44, and a bunch of other goodies. Best of all the family memories.
04 Mustang Cobra, KenneBell 2.2 feeding a lot of boost on E85. Tire shredding machine
New project: 77 Bronco Ranger, body work and more body work.
Very little left of a 72 durango tan explorer sport
-
ZOSO - Moderator
- Posts: 3907
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:58 pm
- Location: Henderson, Co
Re: Ranking the generations
by Jesus_man » Mon Feb 12, 2024 10:34 am
ZOSO wrote:1,2,3,6,5,4.
This is where I'm at as well.
1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow.
http://www.ucora.org
http://www.ucora.org
-
Jesus_man - Official CCB Member
- Posts: 5987
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:36 am
- Location: California
Re: Ranking the generations
by Strike2 » Mon Feb 12, 2024 2:05 pm
I'll choose #1 along with the bonus pic it has potential
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Strike2 - Posts: 808
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 10:34 am
Re: Ranking the generations
by Jesus_man » Mon Feb 12, 2024 2:40 pm
I'm certainly basing my ranking off stock rigs.
Modified is a whole can-o-worms!
Modified is a whole can-o-worms!
1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow.
http://www.ucora.org
http://www.ucora.org
-
Jesus_man - Official CCB Member
- Posts: 5987
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:36 am
- Location: California
Re: Ranking the generations
by Strike2 » Tue Feb 13, 2024 5:05 am
Jesus_man wrote:I'm certainly basing my ranking off stock rigs.
Modified is a whole can-o-worms!
LOL Darn as always, I misunderstood the assignment. As they say I wasn't making soup.
-
Strike2 - Posts: 808
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 10:34 am
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests