return line direct to tank, or to accumulator

Get answers to Bronco-related technical issues.

return line direct to tank, or to accumulator

Postby Gunnibronco » Mon May 30, 2016 7:58 pm

Since I'm not putting my aux tank back into my truck, I have an extra return line available. I've read some people don't like running the EFI return line into the accumulator, because it puts hot gas back into your feed. I thought I could run my return line directly to the tank, and also the line out of the accumulator to the tank.

But I was wondering if the HP pump could pull more than the LP pump could push. Therefore needing some of the returned fuel to make up the difference.

Thoughts? Does anyone know if anyone has done this set up with success? I don't want to cause a problem with a system that already seems to work well.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, TGW HP1060 and HP1014 axles, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, York OBA, 4x4x2, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
User avatar
Gunnibronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 4074
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Location: Gardnerville, NV

Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator

Postby Viperwolf1 » Tue May 31, 2016 12:31 am

The HP pump can flow more than a LP pump.
User avatar
Viperwolf1
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 1485
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 9:37 pm

Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator

Postby Gunnibronco » Tue May 31, 2016 6:11 am

Well, in that case I'll just leave it installed with the return line through the accumulator.

Thanks
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, TGW HP1060 and HP1014 axles, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, York OBA, 4x4x2, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
User avatar
Gunnibronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 4074
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Location: Gardnerville, NV

Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator

Postby RJLougee » Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:42 pm

Viperwolf1 wrote:The HP pump can flow more than a LP pump.


Yes, but that is not the same statement as "depends on the LP pump",which is what I would say.

I never run an accumulator, it's a band-aid, like a steering damper.

First choice is to run an in-tank pump, with an in-tank return line.

2nd choice is to run the stock tank, with a Holley Red LP pump, to the Bosch 2000 HP pump, and the return goes straight back to the tank.

It's also important to remember filters between the tank and LP pump, and another one between the HP and rails. If you're running AN lines, there are some interesting/inexpensive options I've been exploring lately.

AND>>>>> it depends on where you drive, how, when, etc... As well as 5.0 vs. 5.8. roller vs. not, etc...
HTH, Joe
'70 Bronco, MAF 5.0, NP435, D44/9", 4.10s, 33" MT/Rs, PS/PB
'71 Bronco, HP D60, Hi-9, 5.38/ARBs, 101" WB, 408 Stroker, AOD, Atlas, 40" MT/Rs, PiMP EFI.
'78 F150 SWB/Stepside/4WD, 351W/4R100/NP205, 35" KM2s, under const...
'81 Coachman Caper XL MH, 4WD, EFI 460/ZF/BW1356, D44/Sterling, 4.10s/35s, under const...
'83 Bronco, D60/Sterling, 5.13/ARBs, MAF EFI 351W/ZF/BW1356, 37" MT/Rs.
'12 Buggy, HPD60, Hi-9, 4.10s, Explorer 5.0, Atlas 4-speed, my chassis, EB skins.
And the latest project is a '99 Ranger Extra-Cab, custom frame/tube work, on 40s...
User avatar
RJLougee
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 215
Images: 0
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 12:40 pm
Location: Falcon, CO

Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator

Postby Gunnibronco » Sat Jun 04, 2016 6:49 am

Thanks,

I've been running a LP pump (1st no name BCB pump, now Carter), accumulator, and E2000 HP pump, since I installed my EFI.

I know an accumulator is not necessary, but since its already installed, I figure it doesn't hurt. I've never had any fuel related issues, except all the junk from a new tank clogging up the preLP filter. I also like that the accumulator acts as a second fuel filter.

I'm interested in fuel line options, but for another upcoming build. I'm running mostly steel lines on this truck, with rubber fuel lines (EFI rated where necessary) & hose clamps. It works, but isn't super attractive.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, TGW HP1060 and HP1014 axles, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, York OBA, 4x4x2, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
User avatar
Gunnibronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 4074
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Location: Gardnerville, NV

Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator

Postby Gunnibronco » Sun Jun 05, 2016 7:32 am

I've been living on the edge, without a filter post HP pump.

What kind of micron filter should I look for post HP pump. I'd like to buy a universal filter so I can use it as an adapter between my 3/8" hard line & 5/16" factory stuff.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, TGW HP1060 and HP1014 axles, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, York OBA, 4x4x2, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
User avatar
Gunnibronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 4074
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Location: Gardnerville, NV

Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator

Postby sykanr0ng » Wed Jun 29, 2016 4:26 pm

From what I've seen 4 micron max.
"You say overkill like it's a bad thing."
User avatar
sykanr0ng
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:46 am
Location: Greeley, CO

Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator

Postby Gunnibronco » Wed Jun 29, 2016 4:36 pm

4? or 40?

I went with this, since I was ordering AN stuff for my PS/Hydroboost.

http://www.anfittingsdirect.com/an-fitt ... p-269.html

Seems like 10 is the smallest I could find scanning Summit for options. Most were 40, some were 100. I figure anything is better than running nothing.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, TGW HP1060 and HP1014 axles, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, York OBA, 4x4x2, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
User avatar
Gunnibronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 4074
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Location: Gardnerville, NV

Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator

Postby sykanr0ng » Wed Jun 29, 2016 4:43 pm

Thread on CB

They said 4, said 10 was still going to let damage causing trash through.
"You say overkill like it's a bad thing."
User avatar
sykanr0ng
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:46 am
Location: Greeley, CO

Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator

Postby RJLougee » Mon Jul 11, 2016 9:40 am

This is what I'm using on a couple rigs, easy to find the filter almost anywhere and fairly inexpensive:

http://paceperformance.com/i-6679807-pa ... tings.html

This is the part# for the AN6 x 16mm fittings: RUS648060

If you need a different fitting, just make sure the end going into the filter is a ?? to 16mm x 1.5 Male.

Or if adapting the AN6 to rubber hose: SUM-220769B and SUM-220765B
HTH, Joe
'70 Bronco, MAF 5.0, NP435, D44/9", 4.10s, 33" MT/Rs, PS/PB
'71 Bronco, HP D60, Hi-9, 5.38/ARBs, 101" WB, 408 Stroker, AOD, Atlas, 40" MT/Rs, PiMP EFI.
'78 F150 SWB/Stepside/4WD, 351W/4R100/NP205, 35" KM2s, under const...
'81 Coachman Caper XL MH, 4WD, EFI 460/ZF/BW1356, D44/Sterling, 4.10s/35s, under const...
'83 Bronco, D60/Sterling, 5.13/ARBs, MAF EFI 351W/ZF/BW1356, 37" MT/Rs.
'12 Buggy, HPD60, Hi-9, 4.10s, Explorer 5.0, Atlas 4-speed, my chassis, EB skins.
And the latest project is a '99 Ranger Extra-Cab, custom frame/tube work, on 40s...
User avatar
RJLougee
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 215
Images: 0
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 12:40 pm
Location: Falcon, CO

Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator

Postby Gunnibronco » Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:07 am

Thanks, I like the OEM availability. Might pick one up.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, TGW HP1060 and HP1014 axles, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, York OBA, 4x4x2, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
User avatar
Gunnibronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 4074
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Location: Gardnerville, NV

Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator

Postby landshark » Mon Jul 11, 2016 8:07 pm

running that same filter on the 76 and 69... cheap and easy to find.
1976 Bronco "Green, Yellow, whatever", 1969 Bronco "Red", 1972 Bronco Stocker "Kind of Blue/Grayish"
User avatar
landshark
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 3942
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: Denver, Wash Park Area

Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator

Postby sykanr0ng » Tue Jul 12, 2016 9:19 pm

This is where I remember seeing 4 micron:

http://classicbroncos.com/forums/showth ... uel+filter

And these are the 4 micron filters mentioned:

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/wix-33481
"You say overkill like it's a bad thing."
User avatar
sykanr0ng
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 12:46 am
Location: Greeley, CO

Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator

Postby Eck » Tue Jul 12, 2016 9:54 pm

I am running this after my accumulator and it fits directly to the rubber fuel hose.

http://www.oreillyauto.com/site/c/detai ... &ppt=C0025


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
User avatar
Eck
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 2460
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: return line direct to tank, or to accumulator

Postby Gunnibronco » Sun Aug 07, 2016 10:34 pm

I did some reading after looking at all the info in this thread. It looks like Wix filters are rated to 4 microns, but most other brands don't list a micron rating. Wix 33481 is the equivalent filter to the one RJ Lougee & Landshark are running. So I went ahead and ordered one. I'll put it up in the engine compartment, just before the fuel rails.

Thanks for all the info.
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe
74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, TGW HP1060 and HP1014 axles, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, York OBA, 4x4x2, custom dash & gauges
72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
User avatar
Gunnibronco
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 4074
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:07 pm
Location: Gardnerville, NV


Return to General 4x4 Technical

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests