4.56 and 33's

Get answers to Bronco-related technical issues.

4.56 and 33's

Postby phyler » Wed Jun 24, 2020 8:19 am

After talking with Eck, I'm almost convinced to go 4.56's with the ZF that I have sitting in the garage. I'm curious if anyone else has run this combo with a 33" tire? Looking at the grim keeper calculator and using actual tire heights, it doesn't seem to be a big difference between the 33 I'll run and the 35 that Eck runs.

There's a guy selling a 9" drop out with posi that was rebuilt at Colorado axle and gear that I'm thinking about doing vs rebuilding mine.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
1975 Ranger Edition that I've had longer than I've been without it.
phyler
CCB Admin
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:41 pm
Location: Erie

Re: 4.56 and 33's

Postby Justin » Wed Jun 24, 2020 10:59 am

What engine are you running?
User avatar
Justin
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 6198
Images: 0
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Location: Lakewood

Re: 4.56 and 33's

Postby phyler » Wed Jun 24, 2020 11:42 am

Justin wrote:What engine are you running?
Currently the stock 302 but have the 351w that came with the zf5. That still needs to be rebuilt and probably won't be for awhile.

I have the np435 with 3.50 and a Lock-right today.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
1975 Ranger Edition that I've had longer than I've been without it.
phyler
CCB Admin
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:41 pm
Location: Erie

Re: 4.56 and 33's

Postby Justin » Wed Jun 24, 2020 11:59 am

As you noted the difference isn't that big-a few hundred rpm. The 302 likes to spin a little more than the 351w will. It mostly depends on your priorities. Do you want better fuel economy and modern highway rpms or a little more scoot and not having to downshift? For comparison, ill be running 4.56 with a 351w on 37s, assuming I can ever figure out why I'm having lean issues and drive the dang thing.
User avatar
Justin
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 6198
Images: 0
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Location: Lakewood

Re: 4.56 and 33's

Postby phyler » Wed Jun 24, 2020 12:04 pm

Justin wrote:As you noted the difference isn't that big-a few hundred rpm. The 302 likes to spin a little more than the 351w will. It mostly depends on your priorities. Do you want better fuel economy and modern highway rpms or a little more scoot and not having to downshift? For comparison, ill be running 4.56 with a 351w on 37s, assuming I can ever figure out why I'm having lean issues and drive the dang thing.
At this point, I'm like you, I'd have to drive it first before I care about those other things. [emoji1787]

I'm not terribly concerned with mileage. With the worn 302, I'm sure 4.56's will make it feel a lot better. I'm thinking with 4.56's it would feel a lot like what I have now with just one more gear in the mix vs using 3rd for everything between 20 and 50mph.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
1975 Ranger Edition that I've had longer than I've been without it.
phyler
CCB Admin
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:41 pm
Location: Erie

Re: 4.56 and 33's

Postby Justin » Wed Jun 24, 2020 2:39 pm

For sure. It'll be a big upgrade either way and 4.56 would give you some breathing room for larger tires if you wanted to go bigger.
User avatar
Justin
Official CCB Member
Official CCB Member
 
Posts: 6198
Images: 0
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Location: Lakewood


Return to General 4x4 Technical

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests