|
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 11:04 pm
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 18 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
pgilbeau
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:06 pm Posts: 639 Location: Falcon, CO
|
Which Atlas
I am seriously looking at getting an Atlas T-case and never realized how many options there are. For some reason I just thought it was 2 spd vs 4 spd, now I have realized there are at least 3 options for the 2 spd. I am looking for any input on what the best options are, I know I have seen the 3.8 and 5.0 2 spds in Broncos.
_________________ 1969 Bronco: Full widths, 3 linked front end, 37's, hydro-boost, 4x4x2 box, ZF5, Atlas t-case, and fuel injected 302
|
Wed Nov 02, 2016 7:18 pm |
|
|
Jesus_man
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:36 am Posts: 5984 Location: California
|
Re: Which Atlas
I have the 4spd with the low-low at 10:1. I LOVE it! if you intend on doing some serious wheeling, go with the deep gears. What is your setup? Auto or manual? What are your ultimate goals for your drivetrain?
I don't know what the current offerings are and while my crawl ratio is outrageously low - I have used it many times! Plus having the 4spd allows me three different low-ranges to suit the conditions.
_________________ 1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow. http://www.ucora.org
|
Thu Nov 03, 2016 7:33 pm |
|
|
pgilbeau
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:06 pm Posts: 639 Location: Falcon, CO
|
Re: Which Atlas
Most of the options I saw where for the 2 speed. My current set up is pretty much irrelevant at this point, I am in the process of an axle swap and decided to start looking to do the trans and t-case immediately after. I have full widths with 4.88's that will be going under it and a 302/C4/D20. I am planning to swap to a ZF-5 and Atlas, the 302 will stay until I find a 351W. I am hoping to have everything done within the next 6 months so I am not as worried about the 302, the only thing holding me back on the 351W is looking for the motor itself.
_________________ 1969 Bronco: Full widths, 3 linked front end, 37's, hydro-boost, 4x4x2 box, ZF5, Atlas t-case, and fuel injected 302
|
Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:23 pm |
|
|
Digger
Official CCB Member
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:53 pm Posts: 1276
|
Re: Which Atlas
I wont talk you out of a 4speed because they are awesome, but I love my 2 speed 6:1 with a ZF5. Crazy slow with the low 1st plus 6:1.
I have to imagine the 5:1 is pretty awesome as well.
As mine sits now, front and rear driveshafts are the same length, so that is a bonus when it comes to carrying spares.
_________________ Cummins R2.8 diesel, ZF5, AtlasII, HP44/BB9, ARBs, coiled / linked suspension, 37" KO2s, full cage, bumpers, etc. Build Thread:
Average 23.5 mpg, Best tank: 25.1 mpg
|
Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:39 pm |
|
|
Jesus_man
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:36 am Posts: 5984 Location: California
|
Re: Which Atlas
I'll admit that the 4spd can create an issue with the rear driveshaft. You really need a high-angle driveline and push the rear axle back as far as you can. Is your new rear a 9"? With a 4spd behind the ZF you need to run a 3/4" spacer, so that pushes things back even further. Perhaps you need an excuse to get a HP 9"?
Note my signature. I'm running what you are planning to do. It's done me well and while I still want to push the rear axle back a few inches, I wouldn't change a thing in regards to gearing. I'm even at 4.10's in the axles.
If you choose a 2spd get the lowest you can and then just use the 5spds in the ZF to get the gearing you need. In the rocks, I think it's all about finesse and you need control to do that. It's just a big jump down to 6:1 from 1:1, where in 5th gear in the ZF @ 6:1 will go only slightly faster than 1st gear @ 1:1. I use my range box or the planetary box when I am snow bashing, or perhaps mudding where you need some wheel spin. You may encounter a situation where you need something in between.
I believe that you can't go wrong getting lower gears in your t-case. It just makes the most sense as you are not sacrificing on-road performance, but gaining so much off-road.
_________________ 1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow. http://www.ucora.org
|
Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:57 pm |
|
|
pgilbeau
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:06 pm Posts: 639 Location: Falcon, CO
|
Re: Which Atlas
Thanks for the advice. Rear end is a 9" but I'm not ready to push the rear end back so I think the 4 speed is out. I was already leaning toward the 2 speed but just not really sure if going all the way to the 5:1 would work out. I want to be able to get on the highway yet still be able to crawl.
_________________ 1969 Bronco: Full widths, 3 linked front end, 37's, hydro-boost, 4x4x2 box, ZF5, Atlas t-case, and fuel injected 302
|
Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:43 pm |
|
|
pgilbeau
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:06 pm Posts: 639 Location: Falcon, CO
|
Re: Which Atlas
_________________ 1969 Bronco: Full widths, 3 linked front end, 37's, hydro-boost, 4x4x2 box, ZF5, Atlas t-case, and fuel injected 302
|
Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:53 pm |
|
|
Gunnibronco
Official CCB Member
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 6:07 pm Posts: 4074 Location: Gardnerville, NV
|
Re: Which Atlas
_________________ "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe 74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, TGW HP1060 and HP1014 axles, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, York OBA, 4x4x2, custom dash & gauges 72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
|
Fri Nov 04, 2016 7:39 am |
|
|
Jesus_man
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:36 am Posts: 5984 Location: California
|
Re: Which Atlas
Yeah, my axle is back the 1". I want to go another 2-3", but as Gunni says, that gets into a ton of body work. The 1" is easy and that is where I am at and it works. So don't discount the 4spd if you really want it. I also didn't help myself clocking my atlas flat so it is completely above the frame. My setup is about the worst case scenario.
I think you can get your Atlas pretty flat before you have to notch the frame, but it will still be exposed below the frame. Chad may have better numbers on there and how it compares to the stock orientation of the D20.
_________________ 1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow. http://www.ucora.org
|
Fri Nov 04, 2016 7:58 am |
|
|
pgilbeau
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:06 pm Posts: 639 Location: Falcon, CO
|
Re: Which Atlas
I am still considering the 4 speed, at this point I am really just trying to gauge the amount of work. The 1" does seem pretty easy and I could probably get that accomplished when I swap axles. Did you do any body mods with the 1" move? Definitely going to check out all your guys threads better when I have some free time.
_________________ 1969 Bronco: Full widths, 3 linked front end, 37's, hydro-boost, 4x4x2 box, ZF5, Atlas t-case, and fuel injected 302
|
Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:51 am |
|
|
Jesus_man
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:36 am Posts: 5984 Location: California
|
Re: Which Atlas
No body mods required and actually this 1" puts the axle back near the stock location. A lift generally pushes the axle forward.
_________________ 1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow. http://www.ucora.org
|
Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:56 am |
|
|
pgilbeau
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:06 pm Posts: 639 Location: Falcon, CO
|
Re: Which Atlas
_________________ 1969 Bronco: Full widths, 3 linked front end, 37's, hydro-boost, 4x4x2 box, ZF5, Atlas t-case, and fuel injected 302
|
Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:06 am |
|
|
Jesus_man
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:36 am Posts: 5984 Location: California
|
Re: Which Atlas
That's what we are all here for! Someone has likely done what you are contemplating and we are all too happy to share experiences.
_________________ 1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow. http://www.ucora.org
|
Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:07 am |
|
|
pgilbeau
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:06 pm Posts: 639 Location: Falcon, CO
|
Re: Which Atlas
One more question before I head out for the day. I currently have a 2" body lift, is that enough?
_________________ 1969 Bronco: Full widths, 3 linked front end, 37's, hydro-boost, 4x4x2 box, ZF5, Atlas t-case, and fuel injected 302
|
Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:50 am |
|
|
Jesus_man
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:36 am Posts: 5984 Location: California
|
Re: Which Atlas
Yep. That's what I have. Unless you clock it flat, you should not have to modify the body.
_________________ 1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow. http://www.ucora.org
|
Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:32 am |
|
|
Gunnibronco
Official CCB Member
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 6:07 pm Posts: 4074 Location: Gardnerville, NV
|
Re: Which Atlas
Regarding clocking options. It will depend on which spacer you choose to use. You should be able to use either a 1/2" spacer, or 3/4" spacer between the Atlas & ZF. They install slightly differently, so they each will give you a different set of clocking options.
JD used the 3/4" spacer and it allows for a flat clock. I used the 1/2" spacer, and it does not allow for a flat clock, I believe. Mine is set like this right now:
DSCN7877.JPG
Advance Adapter's literature & instructions suck, but their customer service has been very helpful. I'd call them and ask for the clocking options with a 1/2" spacer vs the 3/4" spacer. I'm sure they can explain the options. I wasn't going to clock mine as flat as I did, but when it was hanging clear of the frame, it looked really vulnerable to getting caught on obstacles. So I went the extra mile to notch the frame and clock it up. I think with the 1/2" spacer, and a 2" bodylift, you could clock the Atlas like mine, without getting into the tub floor.
I have a 3/4" spacer kit, that I didn't use. They wanted a restocking fee, a discount because it was 'scratched' from test fitting, plus freight back to them. So I didn't return it. I'll make you a nice deal on mine, if you end up going with the 3/4" spacer. I think you'll need a spacer with the 2 speed or the 4 speed.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
_________________ "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe 74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, TGW HP1060 and HP1014 axles, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, York OBA, 4x4x2, custom dash & gauges 72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
|
Fri Nov 04, 2016 11:31 am |
|
|
Justin
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:04 am Posts: 6198 Images: 0 Location: Lakewood
|
Re: Which Atlas
1" back is easy. You can just redrill the spring plates for the centering pins. More than that is a bigger deal. I extended the wheel wells for a longer stretch. It was easy, but my 23 gallon fuel tank is now a limiting factor.
|
Fri Nov 04, 2016 11:49 am |
|
|
Jesus_man
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:36 am Posts: 5984 Location: California
|
Re: Which Atlas
_________________ 1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow. http://www.ucora.org
|
Fri Nov 04, 2016 12:21 pm |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 18 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|