|
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:51 pm
|
Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
Author |
Message |
Kinder
Official CCB Member
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 10:03 pm Posts: 4371 Images: 0 Location: Parker, CO
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
What he said^!
_________________ Best to Date MPG: 26.6
|
Thu Mar 16, 2017 6:55 pm |
|
|
Justin
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:04 am Posts: 6198 Images: 0 Location: Lakewood
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
x3. Always impressed by your handiwork.
|
Thu Mar 16, 2017 8:48 pm |
|
|
Digger
Official CCB Member
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:53 pm Posts: 1276
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
She works! In 20 years and 4 trucks with concentric slave cylinders, this weekend was the first time I could not get one to bleed correctly. I now know Eck's frustration after bleeding all day Saturday, bench bleeding the master twice, and rechecking every connection including the quick connect. I finally gave up and pulled the transmission and reconnected the slave by itself. Using a giant threaded rod to hold it together, I reconnected it and it still won't bleed, but I could hear the air being sucked into the slave every time someone let off the clutch pedal. I gave up and replaced the slave. The new one bled the air in one pump. Taking the old unit apart, I could see that the seal was crooked and not sealing properly. Looking at the seal design, I think I understand why this design is so problematic for so many people. It's not necessarily good or bad parts, but a susceptibility of the seal to suck air or tip during the bleeding process. All that aside, the quick connect works great. The instructions for the new slave cylinder give some insight into the different fittings I found in the box of goodies from Eck. It does appear there are two distinct sizes of quick connect. The more common one I've seen (black) has a mating diameter of ~.61" and the smaller one is gold in color and measures ~.56".
_________________ Cummins R2.8 diesel, ZF5, AtlasII, HP44/BB9, ARBs, coiled / linked suspension, 37" KO2s, full cage, bumpers, etc. Build Thread:
Average 23.5 mpg, Best tank: 25.1 mpg
|
Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:56 pm |
|
|
pgilbeau
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:06 pm Posts: 639 Location: Falcon, CO
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
Something I noticed when sourcing parts for my ZF-5 was that there is a split around 1991. On the O'Reilly site all the part numbers for the slave, master, and hose are different from 1991 down. The black connector goes with the "early" 1991 down stuff and the gold goes with the "later" 1992 up stuff. The part numbers are Dorman 628-203 for the "early" and Dorman 628-201 for the "late." It does list the connectors as different sizes. I noticed this because my transmission has an '89 build date and I had a '95 master, neither hose would work. That being said I think you have to match the slave, master, and hose with the correct "early" or "late" version.
_________________ 1969 Bronco: Full widths, 3 linked front end, 37's, hydro-boost, 4x4x2 box, ZF5, Atlas t-case, and fuel injected 302
|
Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:14 pm |
|
|
Kinder
Official CCB Member
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 10:03 pm Posts: 4371 Images: 0 Location: Parker, CO
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
So where do I sign up on the order sheet to get this kit?
_________________ Best to Date MPG: 26.6
|
Tue Mar 21, 2017 6:52 am |
|
|
phyler
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 9:41 pm Posts: 1201 Location: Erie
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
_________________ 1975 Ranger Edition that I've had longer than I've been without it.
|
Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:07 am |
|
|
Eck
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:33 pm Posts: 2460
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
See, I wasn't ! I think the moral of the story is to bleed the slave before bolting up the transmission. If it doesn't bleed after 20 minutes, return the slave cylinder and get a different one! Glad your parts are working... remember I have rights to the first production unit off the line!
_________________ 69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
|
Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:22 am |
|
|
Justin
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:04 am Posts: 6198 Images: 0 Location: Lakewood
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
x3. Shut up and take my money.
|
Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:15 pm |
|
|
Gunnibronco
Official CCB Member
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 6:07 pm Posts: 4074 Location: Gardnerville, NV
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
_________________ "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe 74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, TGW HP1060 and HP1014 axles, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, York OBA, 4x4x2, custom dash & gauges 72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
|
Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:23 pm |
|
|
pgilbeau
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:06 pm Posts: 639 Location: Falcon, CO
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
_________________ 1969 Bronco: Full widths, 3 linked front end, 37's, hydro-boost, 4x4x2 box, ZF5, Atlas t-case, and fuel injected 302
|
Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:27 pm |
|
|
Gunnibronco
Official CCB Member
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 6:07 pm Posts: 4074 Location: Gardnerville, NV
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
I purchased the 'later' stuff at first. When I inspected the trans I had, I realized my slave cylinder was different. I did research, and realized that there were 2 master/slaves as well. I bought a set of the 'early' stuff and have it installed now.
Since the fitting at the slave changed size (something I didn't realize) with the change from 'early' to 'late', I'm just assuming his won't fit the later slave.
I bought the BC Broncos hose, I think it will fit both the 'early' and 'late' set ups. But I like this because you can remove the hose without removing the transmission (making trans removal easier). The roll pin can only be removed from the BC set up with the trans out, and I believe the slave out of the trans.
_________________ "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards." – Claire Wolfe 74-AWB 98", ZF5, Atlas4, TGW HP1060 and HP1014 axles, ARBs, 37's, 3.5" lift-5.5" front coil springs, Tahoe rear springs, EFI 302, h-boost, York OBA, 4x4x2, custom dash & gauges 72 U15- Explorer Sport-Candyapple Red (1 of 141)
|
Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:32 pm |
|
|
Eck
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:33 pm Posts: 2460
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
_________________ 69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
|
Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:37 pm |
|
|
pgilbeau
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:06 pm Posts: 639 Location: Falcon, CO
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
_________________ 1969 Bronco: Full widths, 3 linked front end, 37's, hydro-boost, 4x4x2 box, ZF5, Atlas t-case, and fuel injected 302
|
Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:42 pm |
|
|
Digger
Official CCB Member
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:53 pm Posts: 1276
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
_________________ Cummins R2.8 diesel, ZF5, AtlasII, HP44/BB9, ARBs, coiled / linked suspension, 37" KO2s, full cage, bumpers, etc. Build Thread:
Average 23.5 mpg, Best tank: 25.1 mpg
|
Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:32 pm |
|
|
pgilbeau
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:06 pm Posts: 639 Location: Falcon, CO
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
Yep, I will have to verify tomorrow, pretty certain I have the early slave at this point. Any chance you are going to make a run of these for club members?
_________________ 1969 Bronco: Full widths, 3 linked front end, 37's, hydro-boost, 4x4x2 box, ZF5, Atlas t-case, and fuel injected 302
|
Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:43 pm |
|
|
Digger
Official CCB Member
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:53 pm Posts: 1276
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
_________________ Cummins R2.8 diesel, ZF5, AtlasII, HP44/BB9, ARBs, coiled / linked suspension, 37" KO2s, full cage, bumpers, etc. Build Thread:
Average 23.5 mpg, Best tank: 25.1 mpg
|
Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:48 pm |
|
|
pgilbeau
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:06 pm Posts: 639 Location: Falcon, CO
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
_________________ 1969 Bronco: Full widths, 3 linked front end, 37's, hydro-boost, 4x4x2 box, ZF5, Atlas t-case, and fuel injected 302
|
Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:49 pm |
|
|
Eck
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:33 pm Posts: 2460
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
I'd bet you would get enough interest both locally and nationally to unload 20 units pretty easy.
It's been a little while but I know I bought the MC that has the 90 degree angle instead of the straight out connection. I can't remember which donor vehicle made the distinction and I'm curious if that fitting uses the same diameter as the late or early style slave/MC combo.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
_________________ 69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
|
Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:13 pm |
|
|
pgilbeau
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:06 pm Posts: 639 Location: Falcon, CO
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
_________________ 1969 Bronco: Full widths, 3 linked front end, 37's, hydro-boost, 4x4x2 box, ZF5, Atlas t-case, and fuel injected 302
|
Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:30 pm |
|
|
Eck
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:33 pm Posts: 2460
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
_________________ 69 Wagon, 351W, Explorer EFI & Serpentine, ZF5, 35" tires, 3.5 SL, 2 BL, WARN 8274
|
Tue Mar 21, 2017 11:33 pm |
|
|
Digger
Official CCB Member
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:53 pm Posts: 1276
|
Re: Building a better ZF5 slave cylinder fitting
_________________ Cummins R2.8 diesel, ZF5, AtlasII, HP44/BB9, ARBs, coiled / linked suspension, 37" KO2s, full cage, bumpers, etc. Build Thread:
Average 23.5 mpg, Best tank: 25.1 mpg
|
Wed Mar 22, 2017 9:12 am |
|
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|