|
Register •
FAQ
• Login
|
|
It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 8:11 pm
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 6 posts ] |
|
Moog vs. Spicer ball joints
Author |
Message |
Justin
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:04 am Posts: 6198 Images: 0 Location: Lakewood
|
Moog vs. Spicer ball joints
Any functional differences other than cost? The Moogs run $47 for uppers and $42 for lowers at O'Reilly, Bronco Hut carries the Spicers for $42 for a pair (one each of upper and lower). I'm steering away from generic China made junk, but have always thought Spicer made good parts in general so I'm not sure if this is a way to save a little without going to something that is lower quality. Also, the 78-79 ball joints are the same as the earlier D44 ones, correct? Any advice appreciated.
|
Mon Apr 18, 2011 8:18 pm |
|
|
crawlercreations
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:36 pm Posts: 1101 Location: Arvada
|
Re: Moog vs. Spicer ball joints
I like the spicer joints personally. They are both good joints though. 78 and 79 ball joints are the same....I have 79 knuckles on my 72 Dana 44 without changing joints.
_________________ There is a fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness"
|
Mon Apr 18, 2011 8:45 pm |
|
|
Justin
Official CCB Member
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:04 am Posts: 6198 Images: 0 Location: Lakewood
|
Re: Moog vs. Spicer ball joints
Having done a little more research it looks like the NAPA premium are made by Affinia. Guess who owns Spicer? It appears that the NAPA, Spicer and Raybestos ball joints are all the same part. They've got 2 grades and I'm guessing the Bronco Hut joints are the lower grade, given the money they're asking. Looks like NAPA has the higher end ones for a little less than Moog, may be the better way to go. I'm seeing increasing reports of problems with the Moog parts over the past year or two.
|
Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:00 pm |
|
|
ZOSO
Moderator
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:58 pm Posts: 3906 Location: Henderson, Co
|
Re: Moog vs. Spicer ball joints
I put moog in my 79. The spicers we just got for the 74 are stamped with trw. Something else to think about
_________________ Rob
74 Ranger EFI351w, 4r70w, ARB 5.13 9in, ARB 5.13D44, and a bunch of other goodies. Best of all the family memories.
04 Mustang Cobra, KenneBell 2.2 feeding a lot of boost on E85. Tire shredding machine
New project: 77 Bronco Ranger, body work and more body work.
Very little left of a 72 durango tan explorer sport
|
Tue Apr 19, 2011 6:02 am |
|
|
Crazyone
Official CCB Member
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:33 am Posts: 207 Location: Aurora, CO
|
Re: Moog vs. Spicer ball joints
If you can hold off for a couple of weeks, I will be posting a discount for CCB members that will allow you to purchase Ingalls Engineering ball joints (a Colorado Company). These are a premium ball joint that stack up as equals to the Moog and Spicer products. They should come in quite a bit less than the Moog and Spicer with the discount.
_________________ You will not see me cry because I do not sing the blues
|
Tue Apr 19, 2011 8:41 am |
|
|
Jesus_man
Official CCB Member
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:36 am Posts: 5984 Location: California
|
Re: Moog vs. Spicer ball joints
check rockauto.com. They had some good prices a few months ago on the moog's.
J.D.
_________________ 1973 Bronco, 351 SEFI, Locked, discs, 35's ZF-5spd and Atlas 4spd. 235:1 Crawl Ratio. It may be ugly, but it's slow. http://www.ucora.org
|
Tue Apr 19, 2011 10:56 am |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 6 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|